Blogcritics recommends Cyberwurx Hosting with blog hosting as low as $5/month
Jump to: main content, Blogcritics Home
Blog + Critics = Blogcritics.org


Buy Now!
Buy Now!









BLOGCRITIC OF THE DAY Visit and Pay Homage:
Are you a blogger? JOIN BLOGCRITICS
Are you an small publisher or self-published author? THIS IS FOR YOU!
SAVE TIME AND MONEY! Blogcritics is your BUYER'S GUIDE. Follow the AMAZON links!
Book: Carl Melcher Goes to Vietnam
Paul Clayton is the author of Carl Melcher Goes to Vietnam
Freefire zones, arclights, sappers? What was the war in Vietnam really like? Go now with Carl to find out.

Top Posters

Most prolific Blogcritics for April
Eric Olsen (59)
Chris Beaumont (47)
DrPat (35)
Chris Muir (30)
Katharine Donelson (27)
Matt Paprocki (25)
Eric Berlin (22)
Steve Huff (20)
Temple Stark (20)
PoopyCaca (19)


Show your love:
Blogcritics: news and reviews

Blogcritics: news and reviews
Blogcritics: news and reviews
Link to Blogcritics!


The Science of Marijuana sheds light on a "dark" drug

Posted by Mark Edward Manning on May 11, 2005 08:41 AM (See all posts by Mark Edward Manning)
Filed under: Books, Books: Nonfiction, Books: Politics and Affairs, Books: Reference, Books: Science - Scroll down to read comments on this story and/or add one of your own.

The Science of Marijuana
Leslie L. Iversen
Book from Oxford University Press
Release date: 15 December, 2001

"Who is right?" asks Leslie L. Iversen, a professor in the Department of Clinical Pharmacology at Imperial College London School of Medicine and founder of Panos Therapeutics Ltd. "Is cannabis a relatively harmless 'soft drug?' Does it have genuine medical uses that cannot be fulfilled by other medicines? Or ... [i]s cannabis in fact an addictive narcotic drug that governments are right to protect the public from?" These questions are posed to the reader in the first chapter of his book The Science of Marijuana.

Although it was first released by Oxford University Press in 2000, The Science of Marijuana is still a knowledgeable and relatively up-to-date work that delves into the history, pharmacology, chemical composition and related compounds, the effects of and the societal attitude to the drug. Dr. Iversen describes himself as "a scientist who works on understanding how drugs act on the brain" and served as a consultant to the House of Lords Committee on cannabis, which declared, in 1998, that marijuana has both good and bad points. (How uncontroversial of them!)

One major, fascinating fact to be exposed early in the book (Chapter 2, "The Pharmacology of THC") is that cannabinoid receptors exist in the brain and that they may be related to the opiate receptors. This would suggest that there might be naturally occurring cannabinoids in the human body. If this is true, then it is obvious that THC, the drug component of marijuana, works by stimulating the endorphins that regulate cannabinoid activity in the brain. However, as Iversen informs us, more research would be needed to establish this.

Iversen next discusses the effects of cannabis on the central nervous system. He describes both the mostly pleasurable, but sometimes frightening experiences that can occur, that marijuana can cause "double consciousness," in which people can actually train themselves to act normally while intoxicated, and the temporary failure of working memory - though the ability to remember previously learned material remains unaffected.

With regard to medical marijuana, Iversen explains that cannabis was long used as a remedy for constipation, gout, malaria, rheumatism and other various pains in Eastern culture, but wasn’t taken seriously for its medicinal capacities by the West until the 1800s. Unfortunately, as doctors soon discovered:

The potency of commercial preparations varied from pharmacist to pharmacist as there was no means of standardizing the preparations for their content of the active drug. What proved to be an effective dose when using material from one supplier would either have no noticeable effects or would produce unpleasant intoxication.

Due to the problems involved with effectively isolating THC and other cannabinoids, getting a standardized cannabis-based medicine that doctors and governments alike would approve remains difficult. Synthetic analogues of THC are not much better as there is just as narrow a window between pain-killing effects and intoxication as with natural THC. Dronabinol (registered as Marinol), which is delta-9-THC but with low abuse potential, and Nabilone (registered as Cesamet), an analogue of THC, are both discussed in terms of helping chemotherapy patients to deal with nausea and AIDS patients to fight wasting syndrome. But it would appear that, despite considerable anecdotal evidence that marijuana helps chemotherapy patients and those with AIDS, multiple sclerosis, and glaucoma, other drugs exist that do not justify the use of cannabis.

Chapter 5, "Is Cannabis Safe?," is self-explanatory. Although THC is determined to be safe with regard to toxicity, it is made clear that those with heart problems or existing mental illness should not use marijuana. Also, it is also evident that cannabis smoke differs very little in chemical and particle composition to tobacco smoke. As 96 percent of all recreational use of marijuana involves smoking the drug, it could be argued that, on the basis of the smoke alone, cannabis presents a health risk. Iversen also discusses the effects of cannabis during pregnancy, concluding that alcohol is by far the most dangerous to the fetus, but that "although the risks of exposure to marijuana during pregnancy do not appear to be great, it is surely better not to take any drugs during pregnancy, or to drink alcohol or smoke tobacco." No argument there. Unfortunately, as alcohol and tobacco are legal, and therefore tests of their impacts on human health are easy to determine, the illegality of cannabis means that studies on the real impact of cannabis upon mental or physical health cannot be as effectively studied. Who is willing to risk arrest and prosecution under harsh drug laws by either conducting or participating in such studies, after all? Iversen stipulates that since marijuana has only been prevalent in the West since the 1960s, there may not be any conclusive evidence yet as to whether marijuana is truly harmful or not, even if contemporary research into the effects of cannabis were more solid.

Chapter 6 tackles the recreational use of marijuana and one study cited in particular would seem to confirm what the pro-pot crowd has long stressed:

Kandel et al (1996) surveyed 7611 students, aged 13-18 in 53 New York schools. Of these, 995 had experience with marijuana, but there was no evidence that this had any significant impact on their school performance or their family relationships, whereas the small number (121) of crack cocaine users showed significant impairments in both.

Iversen refers to another study of 2,794 young British cannabis users, of which 57.8 percent reported positive effects of their recreational use of cannabis - 25.6 percent of those cited relaxation and relief from stress as the reason they toked. Twenty-one percent reported problems, impaired memory, paranoia and laziness the main problems. Dependence and psychosis together represent just 1 percent of the problems experienced by the British stoners.

The concern over the increased potency of marijuana over the years - that today's pot is not your father's pot - is largely unfounded because THC is not toxic and, as Iversen aptly says, "But is this [increased potency] necessarily a matter of concern? Looking at some of the positive aspects one could argue that if people are going to consume cannabis illegally, then is it not better that they consume material that has been grown under clean conditions?" It is hard to find fault with that point. Also, the higher the potency, the less of a joint a person needs to consume to get the desired high, thereby inhaling less smoke.

The much-argued point as to whether marijuana is a "gateway" drug is aptly referred to by a quote from drug researchers Zimmer and Morgan that Iverson provides:

[M]ost people who ride a motorcycle (a fairly rare activity) have ridden a bicycle (a fairly common activity). Indeed the prevalence of motorcycle riding among people who have never ridden a bicycle is probably extremely low. However, bicycle riding does not cause motorcycle riding, and increases in the former will not lead automatically to increases in the latter. Nor will increases in marijuana use automatically lead to increases in the use of cocaine or other drugs.

Although THC triggers dopamine release similar in fashion to the opiates and the similarity of the cannabinoid and opiate receptors of the brain may explain some cases of dependence on marijuana where they exist, it is a poor argument for the "gateway" theory. This is much more of a personality problem than a problem specific to cannabis. In fact, as Iversen states, parental and peer influence are the prime factors. Through a combination of both, kids will try tobacco and/or alcohol at age 12, and then move on to marijuana at the age of 15. Whether they stop with cannabis or move on to cocaine or heroin is very much dependent upon societal and personal influences. In fact, according to this, are not alcohol and tobacco - legal drugs - "gateways" to marijuana use?

The seventh and final chapter, "What Next?," is also self-explanatory. Iversen provides a history of official early reports into cannabis usage and effects, most notably the Indian Hemp Drugs Commission Report in 1894 commissioned by the British, The Marihauana Problem in the City of New York report by Mayor La Guardia in 1944, and the British Wooton Report in 1968 - all of which stressed that cannabis wasn't, after all, a drug that made people crazy and which condemned its prohibition. But American and British anti-drug lords temporal ignored and rubbished these reports simply because, in each case, it is not what they wanted to hear. The de facto (but by no means de jure) legalization of small amounts of cannabis in the Netherlands since 1976 is also discussed. Iversen determines that it is still too early to tell how successful the Dutch experiment has been, but he appears to think that it has done more good than harm.

Iversen ends the book asking what fate cannabis may face in this, the twenty-first century. He mentions that opinion polls in both the U.S. and Britain overwhelmingly favor a relaxing in the laws governing cannabis and cannabis-based medicines, and that such moves also enjoy substantial support in the medical community who are justifiably frustrated by marijuana's illicit status. But he also concludes that clinical research in the States and Europe will continue until, perhaps one day soon, trials appear so positive that governments will have to follow in line with the wishes of the citizenry. Other matters are discussed too: The specter of marijuana encouraging idleness (as opposed to the aggressiveness that is fuelled by alcohol), the risk of more people becoming dependent on cannabis if marijuana use became more widespread, the treating of marijuana possession and usage as a crime as a reflection of unnecessarily harsh public policy, and the fact that 80 percent of all drug offenses are for cannabis possession and usage. Iversen eventually concludes, "Perhaps the compromise that we are most likely to reach in the foreseeable future would be something resembling the Dutch experiment - a grudging acceptance that cannabis has become part of our culture, but falling short of full legalization."

At the end of this richly factual book, my own attitude to cannabis has not changed. I have been given a lot more insight as to why marketing a cannabis-related drug is so hard and can appreciate the both the positive and negative effects upon one’s health from using marijuana. My personal belief is still that it should be decriminalized (if not legalized). If you are prepared to accept personal responsibility from smoking it, as most do, and are otherwise fit and healthy with no history of mental illness, then you should be allowed to use it.

Even though five years have passed since its publication, The Science of Marijuana is still a wonderful contemporary study of cannabis and I thank Dr. Iversen for helping to embolden my position on this particular drug. It deserves to be read by anyone who is truly interested in knowing the truths, not hyperbole and misinformation, about marijuana.

More fine reading at Blogcritics.org. Scroll down to read comments on this story and/or add one of your own. Support Blogcritics.org by shopping at Amazon.com from this page.

The Science of Marijuana/Leslie L. Iversen

Posted by Mark Edward Manning on May 11, 2005 08:41 AM (See all posts by Mark Edward Manning)
Filed under: Books, Books: Nonfiction, Books: Politics and Affairs, Books: Reference, Books: Science

Comment on this post and/or leave a message for the author here.

Comment 1 posted by MarijuanaMission on May 12, 2005 09:09 AM:

In my opinion, marijuana prohibitions demonstrably protect manufacturers of inferior products and harm consumers, violating long established antitrust common law prohibiting restraint of trade.

Cigarettes manufactured in America are legally allowed to contain Polonium 210, and the ingredients of cigarettes are not required to be listed. Of course, tobacco smoke also contains nicotine, a deadly poison.

Nicotine and Polonium 210 are known carcinogens. The Volcano vaporizer demonstrated an almost complete elimination of the only toxic properties in cannabis smoke, including polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, benzene, bezo(a)pyrene, toluene and carbon monoxide:


Also, note that those promoting hysteria surrounding cannabis and schizophrenia are careful not to suggest that the 80 PERCENT of schizophrenics that self-medicate with tobacco ought to be arrested in order to send a message to children:



The U.S. Office of National Drug Control Policy is running paid advertisements claiming that cigarettes are safer for kids than a joint, copy and paste the link into your browser to read more:



Perhaps not coincidentally, tobacco firms originally funded the Partnership for a Drug Free America, (www.sumeria.net/politics/pdfa1.html ) which currently publishes pharmaceutical companies as 15 of their top donors:


see also: www.cannabisculture.com/articles/4258.html

and: www.drugfree.org/Portal/About/NewsReleases/Sharon_Jaycox_Daitz_Joins_Partnership_for_a_Drug-

Altria is by far one of the world's largest political contributors:




The products that would compete with cannabis kill millions globally, every year:

from: www.worldbank.org/html/extdr/hnp/hddflash/hcnote/hrn001.html

"The annual global tobacco death toll is already about three million--about 1 million in developing countries-- and will rise to more than ten million by the 2020s according to current trends. Most of this increase will occur in developing countries. Of all the people aged under 20 alive today in China, 50 million will die prematurely from tobacco. For men, the epidemic of premature death from tobacco has already become substantial in all developed countries. The death rates in middle-aged men from all causes are especially high in eastern Europe"

Of course, Altria owns Kraft Foods, another manufacturer selling products that would otherwise be forced to compete in a legal market with cannabis. This industry makes extra profits thanks to defective, dangerous and deadly ingredients (partially hydrogenated oils, saturated fats, excessive refined sugar):


Drug war IS crime. Any questions? Perhaps they ought to be disclosed:


Comment 2 posted by jadester on May 12, 2005 09:50 AM:

"...a grudging acceptance that cannabis has become part of our culture, but falling short of full legalization."
The funny thing is, here in England, we're almost at that point anyway.
Although, somewhat disappointingly, the government is now looking at upping the classification of cannabis once more. At the same time as seeming to be more than happy with our alcohol problem...

Post a comment

(Or ping: http://blogcritics.org/mt/tb/29347/)

[ Please read the Official Comment Policy.]


Email Address:

(The email address will be displayed using special encoding for spam-protection, and is not displayed at all if an URL is supplied.)



Remember info?

Syndicate Blogcritics.org

Add to My Yahoo!

Hot Topics
On It IS the Steroids! by RJ
We need an Amazon link here, bro... [more]

On The Man Who Knew Too Much (1934): A Review by Alonzo Mosley (FBI)
I admit to have never seen the original 1934 versi... [more]

On CD Review: Tord Gustavsen Trio - The Ground by Mark Saleski
this is the first one i've heard of them, so i obv... [more]

On Racing Sims Redefined: Forza Motorsport by swingingpuss
What I love about Forza is that players can exchan... [more]

On Thoughts On Jim Carruthers by Aaron, Duke De Mondo
eric, my thoughts exactly [more]

On Review: 3 Cheese Stuffed Crust Pizza by RJ
I tried it recently. Not great, but good. Certa... [more]

On Sexy Bloggers by Aaron, Duke De Mondo
Aaman and tiny Aaman!!! awwww [more]

On CD Review - Love Tractor: Black Hole by greedydog
It's a Mickey Mouse watch...not a flag. [more]

On Cassini Discovers New Moon by RJ
Let's nuke Enceladus until the H2O runs wet. I'... [more]

On A Current Affair`s BIG Adventure - "Tracking Manitoba's Bigfoot" by goodstory
Gridbug, we realize you are sitting alone in your ... [more]

On Jeb Bush and Rapists' Rights by Becky
Good point bhw. I wouldn't be surprised if somethi... [more]

On An Open Letter to Tori Amos by Andrew
Overzealous fans may think everything she does is ... [more]

On X-rated thoughts about chimeras by RJ
"I mean, given the choice, what would you rather h... [more]

On Is Cal Thomas A Terrorist? by RJ
Believe it or not, just because Bush is President,... [more]

Who better to hate moms than smothered, resentful ... [more]

On Pat Buchanan Asks: Was WWII Worth It? by jadester
well, i'm hardly what you'd call balanced, but i d... [more]

On The US has its own Robert Kilroy-Silk by RJ
"Michael Moore was at the Republican convention to... [more]

On Michael Jackson Trial: Grifters, Lickspittles, and Boys Boys Boys by mel267
This is all very interesting and diverse opinions,... [more]

On Get Your HoJo Working by ClubhouseCancer
SPURIOUS COMMENT: I am commenting on my own post i... [more]

On American Idol--Anthony Sent Packing by Eric Olsen
I think you're right Steve, I believe I deleted th... [more]

On Is Swedish Democracy Collapsing? by Steve S
and your point is taken as well, gonzo! [more]

On American Idol: Anthony Flies Coach by Eric Olsen
yes, I don't get that line of reasoning at all - w... [more]

On Young Singer Makes Her Mark With CD "Enter In" by Steve Woodson
I also agree with Cindy and the Muzikman. What a w... [more]

On Fallen Idol: Straight Up, Now Tell Me, Are You Gonna Love Me Forever? by Natalie Davis
I don't think Paula Abdul can sing at all. I alway... [more]

On Flashback Review: Pop Will Eat Itself by Eric Olsen
excellent Robert, great memories. My fave PWEI is ... [more]

Open threads on:
Music, Video/Film/TV, Books/Magazines, Culture/Technology, and Politics

Top Commenters

Most prolific Commenters for last 24 hours (updated 15:20)
Eric Olsen (46)
Steve S (32)
Eric Berlin (29)
Aaman (20)
Nicolette Rivers (19)
swingingpuss (14)
bhw (12)
Eric Berlin (12)
alienboy (11)
Dave Nalle (11)



by Al Barger
Indie CDs by Jon Sobel
Overlooked Alternatives by by Tom Johnson
Reissues by uao
DVDs by Duke De Mondo
DVD Pick of the Week by Chris Beaumont
Movies by Chris Beaumont

Friday Morning Listen
by Mark Saleski
Music Mag Music by Triniman
Artist Overview by uao

Mondo Radio Podcast
by Duke De Mondo
Dumpster Bust Radio by Eric Berlin

Cathode Ray Fray
by Eric Berlin
The Week That Was by Chris Beaumont
Sci-Fi TV Films by Matt Paprocki

Weekly BlogScan
by DrPat
Female Blogs by Natalie Bennett

The Not-Quite-Sunday Funnies by Annie
Flickr Highlights by Phillip Winn
Mundane Visual Pollution by Chris Beaumont



NEW: Teel James Glenn
Lance Anderson
Don Hurst
Eric Flint

Nadine R. Carter
Opiate For the Masses
Memphis Bleek
Reza Aslan
Ash's Tim Wheeler
Jane Goodall
Temple Stark, pt 2
Michael Geoghegan, pt 2
Robert B. Parker, pt 2, pt 3

Michael Z. Williamson
Tom Verlaine
Daniel J. Flynn
"Mr P" - young Bush administration operative
Motorhead's Lemmy
Seed of Chucky Director Don Mancini
Gregg Hurwitz
Frank Marino
Hans Koning
Relient K
Eric Olsen
Tom Wolfe
The Golden Republic
Guy Kawasaki
Nicolas Cage
Beyond Indigo's Kelly Baltzell
Ginger of the Wildhearts
Douglas Rushkoff
Tim Catz of Antler
Incredibles director and producer
Joe and Phil Nicolo
Kevin Shirley
Chimaira, Machine Head, Trivium
Pete Trewavas of Marillion
Sascha Konietzko ('04)
Johnny Clarke
Joseph Hill
Dan Oliver
Sonic Youth
Katie Melua
Korean director Kim Ki-duk
James Lowe of the Electric Prunes
Toby Morrell of Emery
Travis Morrison
Mickey Bozinovich
Christopher Deliso
Clayton Teague
Jason Priestley
Sonny Landreth
Emmylou Harris
Mark Anderson
Henry Kisor
Stephen Unwin
Me'shell Ndegeocello
Greg Ginn
Mike Watt
Paul Barker
Chris Muir
Andrew Sullivan
Jeremy Pelt
Sascha Konietzko ('98)
Brock Clarke
Jay Nussbaum
Mau Mau Sex Sex producers
Richard Brookhiser
Peter Tosh
William Tsangares
Mary Carey
Andrew Loog Oldham
Tucker Carlson
Rick Hiebert
Always Sunday
Allan Slutsky
Dr. Helen Smith
Jan Hammer
Martin Atkins
Gretchen Lieberum
Billy "illy B" Martin
Buzz McCoy
Neal Pollack
Steven Van Zandt
Frank Black
Les Paul
Cary Sherman


Austin News 8 Web Sighting

About.com Blog In Profile

Best Weblog About Music, 2003 Weblog Award

A Yahoo! Pick of the Week

Best Media Blogs

Web Winner
Philadelphia Inquirer

Sarah's Picks
TechTV Blog Report

Blogcritics on NBC-TV
Mike Wendland's High Tech Talk

Movie Blog Pick
Toronto Star

2004 Weblog Awards
Best Group Weblog Nominee

Best Blog Directory And RSS Submission Sites

   Blog: contraction of "web log," i.e., personal journalism web site.
+ Critics: those who discuss and evaluate cultural artifacts.
= Blogcritics.org: News and reviews of popular culture by multitude of superior bloggers.

In Association with Amazon.com

Latest posts
All posts